Philosophy Buffer

Philosophy Buffer The group Philosophy Buffer's Page

Permanently closed.
No such confusion, corrupt Banks.
08/01/2022

No such confusion, corrupt Banks.

08/10/2021

OUR PAGE IS NOW CLOSED FOR SOME *ANALYTICS* RELATED REASONS.

Will update when knowing more.

Thank you.

Ciao, minus the O đŸ€Ș😜😛😇😅😘👍

https://www.nateliason.com/notes/denial-of-death-ernest-becker
12/06/2021

https://www.nateliason.com/notes/denial-of-death-ernest-becker

Phenomenal book on how our fear of death is the core of our psychological disturbances, and our motivation for life. It will make you think about why we do things and behave in certain ways in an entirely new fashion, and the language within it is delicious.

10/06/2021

"Mankind's common instinct for reality has always held the world to be essentially a theatre for heroism. In heroism, we feel, life's supreme mystery is hidden. We tolerate no one who has no capacity whatever for it in any direction."

—William James

What does this quote mean to you? Do you believe this quote is accurate? Why or why not? I look forward to seeing everyone's answers!

17/05/2021

“In the life of man, his time is but a moment, his being an incessant flux, his senses a dim rushlight, his body a prey of worms, his soul an unquiet eddy, his fortune dark, and his fame doubtful. In short, all that is of the body is as coursing waters, all that is of the soul as dreams and vapours; life a warfare, a brief sojourning in an alien land;and after repute, oblivion. Where, then, can man find the power to guide and guard his steps? In one thing and one alone: the love of knowledge.” by Marcus Aurelius

“Whenever anyone criticizes or wrongs you, remember that they are only doing or saying what they think is right. They ca...
17/05/2021

“Whenever anyone criticizes or wrongs you, remember that they are only doing or saying what they think is right. They cannot be guided by your views, only their own; so if their views are wrong, they are the ones who suffer insofar as they are misguided.” by Epictetus

Tolerance to the utmost extreme...It is worse than the lack intolerance it replaces, it is an absolute danger to humanit...
17/05/2021

Tolerance to the utmost extreme...

It is worse than the lack intolerance it replaces, it is an absolute danger to humanity.

How tolerant do we plan on becoming, because if we are not already tolerant enough of the things we should be tolerant of, then we are not becoming tolerant toward what should be tolerated and are allowing too much toleration in areas that are by far already more than tolerant enough...

Soon we will be tolerant towards what's immoral...

Thoughts?

Bah, another short one here...Peoeple are the only problem...What I mean is this, Guns do not cause problems, people do,...
17/05/2021

Bah, another short one here...

Peoeple are the only problem...
What I mean is this, Guns do not cause problems, people do, drugs do not cause problems, people do in fact, cause instant problems, if it is not caused directly “, then I ask how they act, where do they stay, because they hardly make any sense to me from what I have garnered through your examples.

So why Do we avoid the problem that is, which is that at the core of things, many things will become available, and with a little further time, we will have spent enough time, to effectively manage the process that you have initiated.. but as for free-flowing internet, it was meant to show nothing at all...

Basically the problem is being dictated by outside forces...

What do you all think?

Ok here's is just a brief one.Knowing of the workings of Law leads to possibilities not yet considered by you.And I'm no...
17/05/2021

Ok here's is just a brief one.

Knowing of the workings of Law leads to possibilities not yet considered by you.

And I'm not implying the details here, I am talking the essence, what makes Law, law, aside from Law??? Well the opposite, lawlessness, what is lawless is what helps us define what is lawful, and these decisions are possible with an academic legal degree, but not without one, without one, one must be wait for another, which leads to another and a final one last question, half in half out.

It is always better to avoid a fight where possible, where not avoidable do what is needed to survive...

So with the Law, "one" can change everything for everyone, yes just "one" is really all it takes, given the needed systems upgrades...

Achieving law ourselves, we do not ever suffer.

Once understanding of Law is achieved you are given freedom and power, and it is as a test... One which I am too tired to wait for.

Power or freedom in relations?
Going to have to be the best way for you and your surroundings, no where for me to go to, and quite frankly I am getting too tired.

Good readings

Speak again.

For a break from complete and total insanity, here is a lighter way at interpretation of why I view killing as nothing e...
17/05/2021

For a break from complete and total insanity, here is a lighter way at interpretation of why I view killing as nothing evil. Given there is no concrete about my thoughts, but imagining them as concrete does in fact lead to the logic being valid, so all it comes down is what you truly believe when it comes down to death and it's truths...

Personally I don’t believe anything spiritual should have any real impact on what is seen as the concrete appearance of those things.

I honestly believe that with spirituality removed or in fact, more heavily implemented in the thought processes of immorality and the other topics, specifically with morality, I find that with a solid spiritual understanding of how things are or ought to Be, we would find it much easier to justify so much that we find unjustifiable now...

For example, “simple killing” not murder or anything overly sinister, is not particularly immoral, not in the slightest, in fact in almost every spiritual way I can conceive, death or being killed is basically the ultimate compassion or freedom that life can effectively give you... as in all spiritual belief I am aware of, death is by no means the end, and is by no means a negative thing... so hypothetically what would be morally right if we apply spiritual rules to material things, is that killing is the ultimate moral truth... and is in no way ever immoral... making war among other things, the morally acceptable nature of the world... of course we as material beings can not comprehend or do not want to comprehend what that really means, which is quite simple really...

War is good and killing is the answer...

Take note, “killing” and murder are very different things, and although killing is overly justifiable in a spiritual view, murder is still not justified and is in fact immoral, because even though killing is acceptable, to plan to kill is not... honestly like a game, it’s great to kill, but horrible to have planned to kill...

Haha, I know this is out there, but it’s just a thought, and I think a reasonably valid opinion.

What do you all think?

It is a begotten ability, begotten through begetting of logic. (Philosophy)When one is a child, they are a true philosop...
17/05/2021

It is a begotten ability, begotten through begetting of logic. (Philosophy)

When one is a child, they are a true philosopher, but with age and certain indoctrination’s we lose sight of our begotten ability that is philosophy...

Philosophy is not the Academic pursuit it is made out to be these days, it is so much more than that...

Philosophy is like the complete set of tools and abilities that we are born with, so like “thought” is the key tool, and we use that key tool to think about our talents/abilities, and to achieve a certain level of knowledge and understanding of those abilities so that we can implement them through a Process that combines all of what you know with all that there is potential to be known, so that you can conclude what “should” be known... then with every new bit of knowledge that is discovered through your methods, should be applied to “your” philosophy...

Now as for academic philosophy, I don’t know how to explain it completely, but what it is doing is teaching you individual parts of a persons complete philosophy, and not in fact the entirety of their philosophy, only that of which we can see and understand, essentially, we see in others academic philosophy, what they have had time to depict themselves for others to understand their view, these philosophers have by no means shown us what philosophy is, it simply shows us what these people concluded through philosophy...

That’s my view...

Philosophy is something undefinable in totality. For it is a thing that grows, and is shaped by the mind that is producing the ideas it is producing...

Philosophy to me is the process of becoming something, philosophy is the means in which we discover things, it is the absolute essence of discourse and discovery...

Gain that’s my views anyways.

My view implies Logic is part and parcel of philosophy, no logic = no philosophy.
Really it means Logic is part and parcel with existence, everything that exists may not have a defined logic, but everything abides by that one thing when it comes to the crunch....

Logic dictates life and death, no logic would mean no life or death, which would imply all is immoral since morality is so heavily based around life and death, and with none to speak of, what is their to base morality off aside from, well nothing... I mean sure, we could say it is something we can gauge by how people treat each other, but if we don’t live or die, then what does it matter how we are treated, it would seem to me that the only logical thing to be able to happen, is that rather than being treated a certain way, the only way that would make any logical sense is if you were subject to every kind of treatment imaginable, so that it’s all fair and even at least, however as we know, their is no logic, so what’s going to happen?

Well I would say nothing or the alternative which is everything, nothing for ever or everything for a moment...

Anyways, I’m just dragging in here, essentially what I wanted to say or bring attention to is, “Philosophy” and what I believe it Is, which is not defined anywhere because simply I don’t believe philosophy can be truely defined, if it’s what I think it is, it’s not something that is logically definable, it is like GOD, it’s there, but it’s never completely defined, because it is forever growing in its existence.... not unlike existence!

I’ll leave it there fir now, sorry for the slight change, from philosophy too logic, ultimately, Philosophy is like the repertoire of tools we are given “at birth” to navigate everything that exists... this repertoire grows as we grow, which fits with my underfunded definition of philosophy, and endlessly growing thing, which is not unlike the essence of existence or “space time” which is as far as we can discern is expanding beyond belief... this too is what I believe Philosophy is doing...

Expanding forevermore in every direction...

Address

Brunswick Heads, NSW

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Philosophy Buffer posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share