Rethink Kids Clothing

Rethink Kids Clothing A different approach to Kid's Clothing...focussed on Locally Produced, Ethically Traded, and Environmentally conscious sourcing

02/03/2026

Times have definitely changed in "the west." But less so in some parts of the world.

Countries without strong unions & robust labor laws are magnets for free-trade style globalists.

Tariffs are one way that a country can protect its workers & their wages.

Sometimes we forget how far we've come in North America & Europe.

The heart of Industrialization.

We take it for granted & become greedy.

Powerful elites, in governments around the world, have ways of convincing their citizens that it's OK to partner with companies & other governments that allow worker exploitation.

But as these images remind us, that's NEVER ok.

Can we at least agree on that?

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1P6rFU8rs6/

12/04/2025

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Very inspiring woman. Sadly Canada has simply exported this issue now to other countries. Particularly with clothing. Co...
11/05/2025

Very inspiring woman. Sadly Canada has simply exported this issue now to other countries. Particularly with clothing. Countries that are too far away to march on our halls of power. It's hard to know how to evoke the same kind of change for those who remain out of sight. Any ideas? Please share.

She was 73 years old when she led children—missing fingers, blind from factory work—on a 125-mile march to the President's doorstep.
Their banners read: "We want to go to school, not to the mines."
And for the first time, America couldn't look away.
This is 1903. The Gilded Age. Rockefeller and Carnegie built mansions while children worked 12-hour shifts in coal mines and textile factories. This wasn't a secret—it was the American economy.
Two million children under fifteen worked in factories, mines, and mills. Some were as young as five years old.
They lost fingers in machinery. They went blind from lint-filled air. They developed curved spines from carrying loads their bodies couldn't support. They died in mine collapses and factory fires.
And the country called it progress.
Into this nightmare walked a woman who refused to accept that children were just cheaper labor.
Her name was Mary Harris Jones. The workers called her Mother Jones.
She was born in Ireland in 1837, immigrated as a child, and built a life as a schoolteacher and dressmaker. She married an iron worker, had four children, and thought she knew what her life would be.
Then, in 1867, yellow fever swept through Memphis. In one week, Mary buried her husband and all four of her children.
She was thirty years old and had lost everything.
Most people would have broken. Mary got angry.
She moved to Chicago, rebuilt her dressmaking business, and started paying attention to who wore the beautiful dresses she made—wealthy women who'd never worked a day in their lives—and who made them—women and children working in sweatshops for starvation wages.
In 1871, the Great Chicago Fire destroyed her shop and everything she owned. Again.
This time, she didn't rebuild. She joined the labor movement.
By the 1890s, Mary Harris Jones had become "Mother Jones"—a name she chose deliberately. She was everyone's mother, every worker's fierce protector. She traveled from strike to strike, coal mine to coal mine, organizing workers and confronting owners.
She was brilliant at it. Sharp-tongued, fearless, and utterly unintimidated by wealth or power. Mine owners hated her. Governors tried to ban her from their states. She showed up anyway.
"I'm not afraid of the pen, the sword, or the scaffold," she told them. "I'll tell the truth wherever I please."
In 1902, she stood with Pennsylvania coal miners during the great Anthracite strike—140,000 men refusing to work in mines where cave-ins and explosions were considered acceptable business expenses. The strike lasted five months. Mother Jones organized, rallied, and kept morale alive.
But it was the children she saw in the textile mills that broke something inside her.
In 1903, in the mills of Kensington, Pennsylvania, children as young as six worked thirteen-hour shifts six days a week. The air was thick with cotton dust that destroyed lungs. The machinery had no safety guards—arms and fingers caught in gears were so common that mill children could identify each other by their missing digits.
They earned three dollars a week. Some gave all of it to parents too poor to survive without it.
Mother Jones walked through the mills and saw seven-year-olds operating machines. Ten-year-olds with white hair from dust exposure. Twelve-year-olds missing hands.
She saw children who'd forgotten how to play.
When the textile workers went on strike that summer, Mother Jones had an idea that would become legendary.
She would march the mill children—the actual children working in the factories—from Philadelphia to Oyster Bay, New York, where President Theodore Roosevelt was vacationing at his mansion.
She would make the President look at what his economy was built on.
On July 7, 1903, Mother Jones began the March of the Mill Children. She started with about 100 children, though the number fluctuated as some dropped out from exhaustion and others joined along the way.
These weren't healthy kids on a field trip. These were children who worked adult jobs. Their bodies showed it.
One boy named James Ashworth was ten years old. He'd lost his left hand in a textile machine. Another child, Gussie Rangnow, was just eight years old—small for his age because malnutrition had stunted his growth. A girl named Edith had been blinded in one eye by flying lint.
They carried banners made from old fabric: "We want time to play." "We want to go to school." "We ask for justice."
The march covered 125 miles over three weeks. They walked through the summer heat, sleeping in barns and union halls. Mother Jones, at 73 years old, walked every mile with them.
In each town, she held rallies. She'd bring the children on stage and tell their stories—not for sympathy, but for outrage.
"Here's a child who should be in school," she'd shout, pointing to a boy missing fingers. "Instead, he's been crippled to make your cheap shirts!"
Newspapers sent reporters. This was theater, spectacle—an old woman leading broken children to confront the President. But it was also truth. Photographs showed children with bandaged hands, hollow eyes, bodies that looked decades older than their ages.
The public couldn't ignore it anymore.
When they reached New York, Roosevelt refused to meet with them. He wouldn't even acknowledge they were there. Secret Service turned them away from the mansion gates.
But it didn't matter. The march had already succeeded.
Newspapers across the country ran stories about the children. Editorial pages that had ignored child labor for decades suddenly discovered moral outrage. States began discussing reform laws. Politicians who'd taken factory money started feeling pressure.
Mother Jones had done what reformers hadn't managed in years: she'd made child labor visible.
The march didn't immediately end child labor—that would take decades and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. But it was a turning point. The moment America had to confront what its prosperity was built on.
Mother Jones continued organizing for another twenty years. She was arrested repeatedly, threatened constantly, and never backed down. She organized miners in Colorado, steel workers in Pennsylvania, textile workers in the South.
She was called "the most dangerous woman in America" by one prosecutor. She wore it like a badge of honor.
"I'm not dangerous to working people," she shot back. "I'm only dangerous to those who exploit them."
In 1930, Mother Jones died at age 93—having outlived most of her enemies and seen many of the reforms she'd fought for become law.
But here's what makes her story different from many labor leaders: she never held an official position. She wasn't a union president or elected official. She had no formal power.
She just showed up. Wherever workers were suffering, wherever children were being exploited, wherever the powerful thought they could crush the weak without consequence—Mother Jones appeared.
With her sharp tongue, her fearless presence, and her absolute conviction that children deserved childhood.
The March of the Mill Children succeeded not because it changed laws immediately, but because it changed what Americans were willing to tolerate. Once people saw those children—really saw them, with their missing fingers and exhausted faces—ignoring child labor became harder.
Mother Jones understood something fundamental: people can ignore statistics. They can rationalize exploitation. They can convince themselves that poverty is inevitable and suffering is just economics.
But they can't ignore a child holding up a handmade banner that says "We want to go to school."
She was 73 years old when she led that march. An age when most people were retired, resting, accepting the world as it was.
Mother Jones walked 125 miles in summer heat to tell the President of the United States that his economy was built on broken children.
He wouldn't meet with her. But the country finally listened.
Because sometimes change doesn't come from those with power.
Sometimes it comes from those with nothing to lose—and the courage to make everyone look.
She called herself Mother Jones because she claimed every worker as her child.
And in 1903, she marched her children—the real ones, with missing fingers and shattered childhoods—straight to power's doorstep.
And demanded their lives back.
The factories didn't close overnight. The mines kept running. The child labor laws took decades.
But America had seen. And once seen, some things can't be unseen.
Mother Jones died in 1930, having fought for sixty years.
The children she marched to Oyster Bay? Some lived to see the Fair Labor Standards Act pass in 1938—the law that finally made child labor illegal nationwide.
They got to go to school after all.
Because one fierce, tireless woman refused to let the world forget they were children first—and workers never.

10/20/2025

Of course, we all need clothes, and lots of other things, too. But every “thing” has a backstory, usually involving a startling amount of raw materials, water, chemicals, energy, carbon, and pollution.

Mindful shopping can help lighten the impact. This may include:

🌎 buying secondhand
🌎 prioritizing quality items that will last
🌎 researching a company’s sustainability promises
🌎 supporting small businesses and local artisans
🌎 waiting 24 hours before making a purchase
🌎 asking ourselves if we really want/need the thing

Because ultimately, the best things in life aren’t things at all. 🫶

05/29/2025
I have been personally involved in the Fair Trade movement for more than three decades now. During that time, neither th...
11/03/2023

I have been personally involved in the Fair Trade movement for more than three decades now.

During that time, neither the mainstream political left or the right came across as particularly exemplary in regards to Fair Trade, always leaning instead towards Free Trade.

Over the last few years, there has been some "talk" about the importance of fair trade on the left, but during that same time period the majority of Canada's Ten Thousand Villages locations have closed, including their online store. This organization has been at the forefront of the Fair Trade movement for close to 80 years now.

Convictions are often evidenced more through our actions, & what we actually spend our money on, than what we say.

The TTV Online store should have exploded during covid. Clearly it was more talk than action on the left.

Talk means little when it comes to Fair Trade.

Lately, the actions of businesses in the States indicate that both sides are realizing that the right "gets it" better in regards to worker/shopper safety, at least on home soil.

Perhaps it's time for both sides to "get it" in regards to ALL workers, regardless of what side of the ocean they live on.

Just thinking out loud here...

Woke companies made their beds but are refusing to lie in them. Virtue signaling companies like Nike and Meta are leaving blue cities for red states. Let's t...

Yet another thing that the workers of the world need to worry about. If the polluted & degrading environments that these...
02/24/2022

Yet another thing that the workers of the world need to worry about. If the polluted & degrading environments that these workers need to operate under are causing more deaths than covid does now, or ever did, why does that not deserve our attention, and why don't we care? If we claim to be about "social justice"...we must care.

Pollution by states and companies is contributing to more deaths globally than COVID-19, a U.N. environmental report published on Tuesday said, calling for "immediate and ambitious action" to ban some toxic chemicals.

Those familiar with the last 100 years of world history know that communism proved to be a very brutal & destructive for...
02/24/2022

Those familiar with the last 100 years of world history know that communism proved to be a very brutal & destructive form of government...but they also know that capitalism has wielded and produced some very destructive & damaging ideologies as well.

How do businesses conduct themselves in a way that truly values their skilled labourers? Because without them we wouldn't exist.

How do we dispel the myth described below, and move forward in a positive way?

I know that Fair Trade is a part of this, but I think that there's more to it than that, and I'm hoping that discussions on pages like this one can bring us closer to better ways of doing business.

Thanks to everyone who decides to give this any thought, effort, and response.

One last thought: I think if we're truly being honest, we need to acknowledge that anyone who has done a particular job for 10, 20, 30+ years is likely now a highly skilled labourer. It might be at a job that we would never want to do, but that just makes their labour more valuable, not less...doesn't it?

By

Image: Nine artistic representations of workers, in a 3 x 3 grid, each tinted with a vivid colours of the rainbow, and captioned with part of the sentence:

"'Unskilled Labour 'Is A Capitalist Myth Used To Justify Poverty Wages."

Yellow: "'Unskilled" A farm worker, holding a farming fork.

Blue: "Labour'" Someone cleaning with a broom.

Magenta: "Is A" Someone working a cash register.

Pink: "Capitalist" Someone washing dishes.

Green: "Myth" Someone serving drinks.

Red: "Used To" Someone cooking food.

Yellow-Green-Brown: "Justify" Someone laying bricks.

Cyan: "Poverty" Someone serving food.

Brown: "Wages" Someone working in a warehouse.

Sadly, the decisions of the rich western nations, still impact producers on the other side of the world. Let's get behin...
11/08/2021

Sadly, the decisions of the rich western nations, still impact producers on the other side of the world. Let's get behind the youth of all nations. Business should never be as much about money as about building a beautiful future for coming generations.

Businesses that aren't about building a beautiful & sustainable future for our children are counter-productive.

Shouldn't our laws be limiting and penalizing the activities of such companies, not encouraging them.

I realize that some young activists have gone too far, and have also become counter-productive.

But let's not forget what they originally stood for, and what we adults should have stood for all along.

Fulfilling & safe work, in an environment that's becoming less polluted. Not more-so.

Greta, Vanessa, Mitzi, and Dominika are taking this bold call to world leaders

Address

Williams Lake, BC

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Rethink Kids Clothing posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share