02/09/2023
Many on social media have found that blasting sensitive locations, Geotagging specific spots and advertising to their thousands of followers to “add these 10 hidden gems to your bucket list now” brings lots of likes and engagement. They then argue that not doing such things is "elitist" and "gatekeeping."
While we’re not “anti -Geotagging, we are pro responsible Geotagging, and above all, responsible visitation. If an area is very well known or obvious, or you want to tag a general location and/or especially an area that does have the resources and infrastructure to handle visitors, knock yourself out. For these more sensitive areas- areas that has no infrastructure, are seasonally sensitive or fragile environments, the plea is to consider your actions, and above all consider that of your thousands of followers, perhaps there may be a few in there who don’t have nature's best interest in mind and aren’t going to put nature first. Not geotagging on social media isn't about preventing anyone from access. It does not stop anyone from going outside, doing some research, being more prepared and putting in the time to be more respectful in their actions.
However, to that, the question is if not putting a specific Geotag with detailed instructions in the name of "helping all get outside" is gatekeeping, what is it called when we are physically barred from locations due to mass overcrowding, litter, poor behavior, and vandalism?
This news article is just one more example in a list of over 50 that we collected of locations/public lands being closed, access restricted or changed, permanently altered, and so on due to the need for fake Internet points by blasting locations.
This is the great irony in our digital age: People blasting locations in an attempt to “stop gatekeeping,” actually creates literal gates being made on public lands.
Food for thought.