10/30/2026
For centuries, scholars have questioned the authenticity of an ancient account of Jesus Christ written by the first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus. Now, new research is challenging those doubts. In his 2025 book Josephus and Jesus: New Evidence for the One Called Christ, Fairfield University professor T. C. Schmidt presents evidence supporting the authenticity of the disputed passage. His findings, highlighted by Fox News on October 30, 2026, draw on ancient manuscripts in five languages and computer-assisted analysis of Josephus' writing style.
Writing around A.D. 93–94 in Antiquities of the Jews, Josephus described Jesus as a wise man who attracted followers, performed extraordinary deeds, and was crucified under Pontius Pilate. He also recorded that Jesus' followers believed He appeared alive again on the third day. Although scholars have long debated whether Christian scribes altered portions of this account, Schmidt argues that its language is consistent with Josephus' own writings. His research strengthens the case that this testimony originated with a Jewish historian who was not himself a Christian.
Importantly, Josephus was not the only ancient writer outside the Bible to mention Jesus or the early Christian movement. The Roman historian Tacitus, writing around A.D. 116, recorded Christ's ex*****on under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius. Pliny the Younger, a Roman governor writing to Emperor Trajan around A.D. 112, described Christians gathering to worship Christ as divine. The Roman historian Suetonius also documented the persecution of Christians under Nero and disturbances associated with a figure called Chrestus, although the identity of that figure remains debated. Together, these historical writings provide testimony from outside the New Testament concerning Jesus and the movement that followed Him.
These accounts do not independently establish every claim of the Gospels, but they demonstrate that Christianity emerged within a real historical setting documented by Jewish and Roman writers. Schmidt's research adds another important contribution to that historical record, reminding us that longstanding scholarly skepticism is not beyond examination. Jesus Christ was not a fictional character invented centuries later. He lived in history, was crucified under Roman authority, and His followers proclaimed His resurrection from the very beginning of the Christian movement. The Bible's account of Jesus is rooted in history, not mythology.