06/06/2026
𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗢𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗧𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗟𝗮𝘄𝘀𝘂𝗶𝘁 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗹𝘆𝗻 𝗛𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁
WALTON COUNTY, Fla. — The trespass lawsuit filed by BLB Beach Hut, LLC and homeowners Brian and Leighanne Littrell against Carolyn Hill remains active despite being dismissed once and refiled, with the latest round of legal filings highlighting the increasingly complicated dispute over beachfront ownership in Walton County.
According to court records, the alleged trespass incidents occurred between April and September 2025, shortly after the Littrells obtained a summary judgment in a separate quiet title case that purported to establish ownership of the beach area extending from their upland property near the dunes to the mean high-water line.
The trespass lawsuit alleges Hill repeatedly entered the disputed beach area, refused requests to leave, and engaged in conduct that the plaintiffs claim interfered with their use and enjoyment of the property.
However, the underlying ownership dispute that formed the basis of the quiet title judgment is far from settled.
Earlier this year, the appellate court ruled in favor of Dune Allen Beach, Inc., reversing portions of the lower court’s decision and sending the case back to Walton County Circuit Court for further proceedings. As a result, ownership claims to portions of the beach remain unresolved pending additional litigation.
A case management conference in that quiet title matter is scheduled for June 9, where the court is expected to discuss how the case will proceed moving forward.
The latest filing in the trespass case came on June 1, when attorneys for the Littrells and BLB Beach Hut filed an amended response opposing Hill’s motion to dismiss. The filing argues that the court has already found the underlying trespass allegations legally sufficient and that the plaintiffs corrected deficiencies identified in an earlier dismissal order.
The response also expands upon why Brian and Leighanne Littrell should be allowed to pursue claims individually despite title being held by BLB Beach Hut, LLC, arguing they possess and occupy the property as their residence.
One notable change in the filing is the withdrawal of the plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees related to the trespass claims.
A hearing on Hill’s motion to dismiss had been scheduled for June 10 but was canceled after the amended response was filed.
The case now remains pending as the court considers whether the lawsuit should move forward. Meanwhile, the larger ownership dispute over portions of Walton County’s beachfront property continues to work its way through the courts, leaving unresolved questions about who ultimately owns some of the very sand at the center of the trespass allegations.
Meanwhile, legal expenses continue to mount. Supporters of Hill note that each new round of filings requires additional attorney work and increases the cost of defending the case. For those interested in helping with those expenses, a link to Hill’s GoFundMe campaign will be shared in the comments.
(One thing this photo does show quite clearly is just how far landward the property’s original boundary appears to be.
The row of “Private Beach” signs is reportedly placed out daily by an unlicensed surveyor to mark what is claimed to be the corners of the property based on the original legal description. While those markers are not a substitute for a licensed survey and do not resolve the ongoing legal disputes, they do provide a visual reference point.
Looking at the location of the signs, it’s apparent that the property’s original boundary line is nowhere near the water’s edge. The current court battles center around claims extending ownership beyond those original upland boundaries toward the Gulf, but the signs themselves offer a reminder of where the original lot was generally understood to end before those claims were made.)